[FLASH-USERS] Two issues (PLUTO and Chombo)

[John ZuHone]

Hi David,

I am pretty sure the Chombo FLASH effort was abandoned a long time ago but someone should correct me if I am wrong. 

Best,

John 
================================
John ZuHone, Chandra/ACIS Operations	
Harvard-Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics

60 Garden St., MS-67       (w) 617-496-1816
Cambridge, MA 02138.     (m) 781-708-5004

john.zuhone at cfa.harvard.edu
http://hea-www.cfa.harvard.edu/~jzuhone
================================

> On Sep 5, 2016, at 9:33 AM, David Melon Fuksman <dmelonf at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Dear all,
> 
> I am beginning to use FLASH to do RHD simulations for my PhD in physics. I would like to bring two questions regarding different subjects.
> 
> The first one is a little strange, about a file called Config in the directory FLASH4.3/source/physics/Hydro/HydroMain/split/RHD. At the 3rd line, it says "# DWL: PLUTO would be  a better choice for doing Relativistic Hydro than FLASH." Does anyone know the source of that line? In any case, if that is so, I would be interested in knowing the reasons for such a claim!
> 
> The second one is regarding the use of FLASH+Chombo. Has anyone tried using Chombo and would like to tell me how did it go? Because I am having some troubles compiling its libraries, and I think it is due to a problem in the paths indicated in the makefiles that I'm not being able to fix. I apologize for bringing this issue here, but I am getting no answer from the Chombo developers, and maybe someone in this list had similar problems.
> 
> Thank you very much for your attention,
> 
> David Melon Fuksman
> Sapienza Università di Roma
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://flash.rochester.edu/pipermail/flash-users/attachments/20160905/e86eedee/attachment.htm>