<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 15 (filtered medium)">
<!--[if !mso]><style>v\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
o\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
w\:* {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
.shape {behavior:url(#default#VML);}
</style><![endif]--><style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
{font-family:"Cambria Math";
panose-1:2 4 5 3 5 4 6 3 2 4;}
@font-face
{font-family:Calibri;
panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
{margin:0in;
font-size:11.0pt;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
mso-ligatures:standardcontextual;}
span.EmailStyle17
{mso-style-type:personal-compose;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;
color:windowtext;}
.MsoChpDefault
{mso-style-type:export-only;
font-family:"Calibri",sans-serif;}
@page WordSection1
{size:8.5in 11.0in;
margin:1.0in 1.0in 1.0in 1.0in;}
div.WordSection1
{page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-US" link="#0563C1" vlink="#954F72" style="word-wrap:break-word">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal">Hi Flash User Group,<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">I was trying to see how chamber size would affect the pre-plasma generation in the LaserSlab example problem. The problem I ran into is that the AMR mesh between the two simulation runs had different mesh sizes even though in the flash.par
file they had the same lrefine_max and set to be equal. I attached both the files above. An example of how the two simulation runs look like in visit can be seen here (Fig A, B). I have also put an example of how I believe the mesh (Fig A) should look (Fig
C). I know I can just create a regular cartesian mesh with i,j,k procs but that would lead to longer runtimes without the AMR so I was wondering if there was any manual way to set the different AMR sizes based on like height in the z-direction in an R-Z problem.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Figure A. Chamber 450 target 10 mesh<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img width="227" height="802" style="width:2.3666in;height:8.35in" id="_x0000_i1027" src="cid:image001.png@01D9BFE6.B01E2850" alt="Background pattern
Description automatically generated"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Figure B. Chamber 150 target 10 mesh<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img width="229" height="370" style="width:2.3833in;height:3.85in" id="Picture_x0020_433113770" src="cid:image002.png@01D9BFE6.B01E2850" alt="A picture containing chart
Description automatically generated"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">Figure C. Hows Chamber 450 target 10 mesh should look like<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><img width="232" height="897" style="width:2.4166in;height:9.3416in" id="Picture_x0020_1" src="cid:image003.png@01D9BFE6.B01E2850"><o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p> </o:p></p>
</div>
</body>
</html>