[FLASH-USERS] Big Problem??

[Seyit Hocuk]

Hi Paul, hi Nathan,

First of all; using --with-default-api-version=v16 when configuring 
hdf5-1.8.1 works fine. Thanks for that Paul.

Nathan, if you mean by uninitialized that the types are not defined 
(like in config file REAL or INTEGER or whatever), then no because I 
define them all. But if you mean I have included modules or parameters 
which I don't use, that's correct and I am no expert in programming so 
it might indeed be good to check this.

Greetz,
Seyit




Nathan Hearn wrote:
> Hi Seyit,
>
>     Forgive me if I am asking a question that has already been
> addressed, but is it possible that there are uninitialized variables
> that are being used in your code?  It is certainly possible that they
> could yield different results with each change in compiler, library
> version, and optimization level.
>
>     If you haven't done so already, you might want to look through the
> output of your first checkpoint file (using hdfview or h5dump) to see
> if any of the datasets have unexpected values.  You could also see if
> your compiler has an option to automatically initialize variables when
> Flash is run (this should not be used to fix the problem, but rather,
> to expose it); if possible, see if you can automatically initialize
> all floating point data to NaN.
>
>
> - Nathan
>
>
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2008 at 4:48 AM, Seyit Hocuk <seyit at astro.rug.nl> wrote:
>   
>> Ah thanks Nathan,
>>
>> I see there is a good link to the api bindings. That answers the question I
>> posted a minute ago I guess.
>> I think I just have to configure hdf5 with a certain flag. "
>> |--with-default-api-version=v16 |"
>>
>> Let me try that out.
>>
>> Greetz,
>> Seyit
>>