[FLASH-USERS] Bug fixes for active particles unit
Chris Daley
cdaley at flash.uchicago.edu
Wed Feb 2 12:41:37 EST 2011
Hi Seyit,
The error you show should be unrelated to the recent patch.
You are seeing a controlled abort in gr_checkGridConsistency
after a Grid consistency check fails. This subroutine is called
in gr_updateRefinement after a refinement/derefinement happens in
amr_refine_derefine.
Some questions that may be useful:
Do you use a custom gr_markRefineDerefine or
Grid_markRefineDerefine? Does the error appear with both
Paramesh-4.0 and Paramesh-4dev? If you manually add an extra
call to gr_checkGridConsistency before amr_refine_derefine in
gr_updateRefinement, does the abort also happen before the
refinement/derefinement?
Chris
Seyit Hocuk wrote:
> Hi Chris,
>
> After applying your patch, I still get the error as shown below when
> using active particles. This is a restart from a running simulation
> which was crashing at the same point. I was hoping that this would now
> be solved, alas.
>
> Kind regards,
> Seyit
>
>
> refined: total blocks = 3145
> Missing neighbors on PE 2, lb= 8,surrblks=( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( 8, 2, 2)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)
> Missing neighbors on PE 2, lb= 8,surrblks=( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( 8, 2, 2)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1, -1,-1)( -1,
> -1,-1)
> *** Wrote plotfile to xSHx_hdf5_plt_cnt_0001 ****
> DRIVER_ABORT: missing neighbor!
>
>
>
>
>
> Chris Daley wrote:
>> To FLASH users,
>>
>> We have recently become aware of two bugs in the active particles unit
>> of FLASH. These bugs do not affect tracer particles.
>>
>> 1). There is an error when mapping a portion of a particle's mass to a
>> neighboring block that is at a coarser refinement level. The bug only
>> happens when a particle is within a zone that is next to a fine-coarse
>> block boundary. It causes integrated PDEN mass on the grid to differ
>> from the total particle mass.
>>
>> 2). There is an error in the calculated size of a receive buffer which
>> can lead to out-of-bounds accesses. The bug can only happen in
>> applications which have explicitly included the non-default
>> point-to-point map particles to mesh implementation (i.e. using
>> -unit=Grid/GridParticles/GridParticlesMapToMesh/Paramesh/PttoPt).
>>
>>
>> The bugs can be fixed by applying the patch attached to this email.
>> Navigate to the top level directory of an untouched version of
>> FLASH3.3 and enter the command:
>>
>> patch -p0 < fix_particle_map_jan_2011.diff
>>
>> Additional information about the fixes is provided in the file
>> svn_log_messages.txt. A copy of all the attachments are at
>> http://www.flash.uchicago.edu/~cdaley/FLASH3.3_patches/fix_particle_map_jan_2011/
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Chris
More information about the flash-users
mailing list