[FLASH-USERS] flash-users Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7
Michel de Peretti
mdeper at gmail.com
Wed Apr 17 13:59:30 EDT 2019
I am not fully familiar with Flash but very often this kind of problem
comes from your equation of state....try to check it.
Hoping that helps you
Michel
Le mer. 17 avr. 2019 à 19:00, <flash-users-request at flash.uchicago.edu> a
écrit :
> Send flash-users mailing list submissions to
> flash-users at flash.uchicago.edu
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> http://flash.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/flash-users
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> flash-users-request at flash.uchicago.edu
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
> flash-users-owner at flash.uchicago.edu
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: Contents of flash-users digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
> 1. The problem of Negative Internal Energy in 3T MHD simulation
> with laser generated plasmas (Huo Wenyi)
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2019 07:43:27 +0000
> From: Huo Wenyi <Wenyi.Huo at eli-beams.eu>
> Subject: [FLASH-USERS] The problem of Negative Internal Energy in 3T
> MHD simulation with laser generated plasmas
> To: "flash-users at flash.uchicago.edu" <flash-users at flash.uchicago.edu>
> Message-ID: <4b8b49f0356446ab9b4326bb39c14550 at eli-beams.eu>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> Dear all:
>
> I am using FLASH to simulate the magnetohydrodynamics in laser generated
> plasmas. However, I always encounter a problem of negative internal energy
> both in FLASH 4.5 and FLASH4.6. Does anyone encounter such a similar
> problem? The error information in the Log file is as follows:
>
>
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] [hy_uhd_ragelike] ERROR DETECTED
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] Zero or negative advected specific internal
> energy detected
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] DENS_OLD = 1.0000904290291E-09
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] DENS_NEW = 1.0000983091349E-09
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] UTOT_NEW = -3.7386802822434E-01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] UEXTRA = -1.7491864582091E+01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] UELE_NEW = -3.7135596091566E-01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] UION_NEW = -2.5120492887951E-03
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] URAD_NEW = -1.8019885718467E-08
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] EELE_VAR = 1.7001438966846E+10
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] EION_VAR = 1.1498940630502E+08
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] ERAD_VAR = 8.2498749422145E+02
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] EELE = -3.7131945682109E+08
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] EION = -2.5118023556785E+06
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] ERAD = -1.8018114373230E+01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] uele_adv = 1.7002978536045E+01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] uion_adv = 1.1501719275908E-01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] urad_adv = 8.2506210304961E-07
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] PELE_VAR = 1.2145270532940E+00
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] PION_VAR = 7.6660475248193E-02
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] PRAD_VAR = 2.7502069901319E-07
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] PELE_ADV = 1.2145343502140E+00
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] PION_ADV = 7.6672066071296E-02
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] PRAD_ADV = 2.7502070101654E-07
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] TELE_VAR = 6.0996867323016E+02
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.488 ] TION_VAR = 3.6907447766733E+00
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.489 ] TRAD_VAR = 1.0219015193890E+02
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.489 ] CELL X = 3.3222656250000E-01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.489 ] CELL Y = 6.9890625000000E-01
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.489 ] CELL Z = 0.0000000000000E+00
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.489 ] You might be able to get things to keep
> running by trying
> [ 04-16-2019 14:34:35.489 ] more diffusive hydro options (reduce CFL,
> order, etc...)
> [ 04-16-2019 22:00:17.496 ] [hy_uhd_ragelike] Negative internal energies
> in 3T update
> [ 04-16-2019 22:00:17.496 ] Falling back to using internal energy
> ratios instead of pressure ratios
>
>
>
>
> I have tried many different RiemannSolvers. It does not help. I guess that
> this problem is related to the grid size, but I am not sure.
>
> Can anyone provide a solution to this problem? Thank you very much!
>
> Best regards,
>
> Wenyi Huo
>
> -------------- next part --------------
> An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
> URL:
> http://flash.uchicago.edu/pipermail/flash-users/attachments/20190417/a66bdae6/attachment-0001.html
>
> ------------------------------
>
> _______________________________________________
> flash-users mailing list
> flash-users at flash.uchicago.edu
> http://flash.uchicago.edu/mailman/listinfo/flash-users
>
>
> End of flash-users Digest, Vol 138, Issue 7
> *******************************************
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://flash.rochester.edu/pipermail/flash-users/attachments/20190417/a8b11599/attachment.htm>
More information about the flash-users
mailing list