[FLASH-USERS] Thin targets in LaserSlab
Norbert Flocke
flocke at flash.uchicago.edu
Tue Jun 4 10:54:54 EDT 2019
Hi Graeme,
Do you use lrefine_min = 1 as a starting resolution? If yes, then your
traget thickness can only be as small as 1 cell side and this depends on
the number cells per block. If you want thinner targets, then you probably
must increase lrefine_min to a higher number, so that the LaserSlab
simulation starts with smaller cells that can accommodate smaller targets.
Best,
Norbert
On Tue, 4 Jun 2019, Graeme Scott - UKRI STFC wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm working on the LaserSlab example and was interested in reducing the target thickness down to a few hundreds of nanometres. It seems that even when I increase the AMR to resolve tens of nanometres, that the target can only get as thin as about ~5 um, and when I try to make it thinner than this it disappears completely. I wondered if there's some configuration setting that's in the setup that's preventing me from getting thinner than this?
>
>
> I have had a look around and all the parameters relating to the target parameters seem to be defined as 'real', and in the .par file I'm using scientific notation to define the values, so it shouldn't be any kind of rounding error. Any help would be very much appreciated.
>
>
> Many thanks,
>
> Graeme
>
More information about the flash-users
mailing list