[FLASH-USERS] [EXT] Mismatch errors while compiling a problem

[Marissa B. P. Adams]

Hi Alexander,

I think you can simply remedy this error by adding the appropriate flags to
your *Makefile.h*. If your *Makefile.h,* add the following flag to the
Fortran flags (FFLAGS_TEST, FFLAGS_DEBUG, FFLAGS_OPT):  -fallow-argument-
mismatch

Please let us know if that helps with the issue. If you run into future make
errors that don't pertain to exactly something you've coded into your
version of FLASH, it probably is fixed with a flag, e.x. uninitialized
functions, etc.

Best,
Marissa

On Sat, May 8, 2021 at 10:05 AM sasharos at campus.technion.ac.il <
sasharos at campus.technion.ac.il> wrote:

> Hello flash-users,
>
> I'm new to FLASH simulation and I have a problem at the initial step. I'm
> running Arch Linux on my pc and packages like mpich and hdf5 I installed
> from the AUR repository. Now the first problem I had was that "./setup
> Sedov -auto" doesn't work and "python2 setup_alt Sedov -auto" must be used
> for Sedov problem initiation. I believe this is because some compatibility
> issues but as long as the Sedov problem is initiated I think I can proceed.
> The next problem occured when I tried the following: "python2 setup_alt
> Sedov -auto -debug". In such a manner the Sedov problem is initiated but
> failed to compile with a lot of mistmatch error message. Looking back to
> the initiation by "python2 setup_alt Sedov -auto" I noticed a lot of error
> mismatch error messages like this one:
>
> "...
> /opt/mpich/bin/mpif90 -ggdb -c -O2 -fdefault-real-8 -fdefault-double-8
> -Wuninitialized  -DMAXBLOCKS=1000 -DNXB=8 -DNYB=8 -DNZB=1 -DN_DIM=2
> mpi_amr_check_derefine.F90
> mpi_amr_check_derefine.F90:150:33:
>
>    53 |                Call MPI_IRECV(refine_par(i),
>     &
>       |                              2
> ......
>   150 |                   Call MPI_IRECV(nodetype_recv(isg),
>     &
>       |                                 1
> Warning: Type mismatch between actual argument at (1) and actual argument
> at (2) (INTEGER(4)/LOGICAL(4)).
> ..."
>
> I would appreciate any help with this issue.
> Thanks!
>
> Alexander Rososhek
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://flash.rochester.edu/pipermail/flash-users/attachments/20210508/1d42ce2a/attachment-0001.htm>