[FLASH-USERS] LaserSlab simulation of a thin target

[Tomer Catabi]

Hey Fernando,

Thanks for the reply, I tried increasing the refine variables, increasing
the number of rays, and the number of blocks in the simulation and I am
still getting the same result. Do you have any other suggestions on how to
increase the number of grid points? Am I missing something?

Thank you very much for your help,
Tomer

On Wed, Oct 12, 2022 at 11:27 PM Garcia Rubio, Fernando <
fgar at lle.rochester.edu> wrote:

> Hello Tomer,
>
> Seems like you might not have enough grid points in the target. As a rule
> of thumb, you want to have 10 grid points across the target thickness.
>
> Hope this helps!
>
> Fernando
> ------------------------------------------
> Fernando García Rubio, PhD
> Assistant Scientist
> Laboratory for Laser Energetics
> 585-957-1743
> ------------------------------------------
>
> El 12 oct 2022, a las 11:48, Tomer Catabi <tomercatabi at mail.tau.ac.il>
> escribió:
>
> Hello Flash users and developers,
>
> I am new to FLASH and am trying to make a simulation of laser induced
> plasma of a thin target (800 nm), similar to the laserslab example.
> I have changed the refinement so that the target is visible, but it seems
> that unlike when running the simulation with a thicker target, the target's
> thickness is not constant in respect to the 'z' axis. Has anyone
> encountered this issue before? or maybe someone has an idea of what is the
> cause of the issue?
> I attached a graph of the electron number density on the 'z' axis before
> the laser interaction in which the issue appears.
>
> Kind regards,
> Tomer
> <0.0 nsns_1d-Profile_z_El_number_density.png>
>
> _______________________________________________
> flash-users mailing list
> flash-users at flash.rochester.edu
>
> For list info, including unsubscribe:
> https://flash.rochester.edu/mailman/listinfo/flash-users
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://flash.rochester.edu/pipermail/flash-users/attachments/20221017/fa9cb981/attachment-0001.htm>