[FLASH-USERS] Negative Internal Energies in the 2D, AMR, Z-Pinch problem

Sutcliffe, Graeme sutcliffe2 at llnl.gov
Tue Nov 5 16:56:04 EST 2024


Hi Paul,

You can try the following par file options if you haven't already, which helped me to get some laserslab runs working back in FLASH4.7 (adjust accordingly if you're not doing a 3T sim):
dr_usePOSdefComputeDt = .true.
dr_posdefdtfactor = 0.1
dr_numPosdefVars = 3
dr_posdefVar_1 = "eele"
dr_posdefVar_2 = "eion"
dr_posdefVar_3 = "erad"

The dr_posdefdtfactor of 0.1 might be a bit aggressive (i.e. too small), I haven't played with it.

Graeme
________________________________
From: flash-users <flash-users-bounces at flash.rochester.edu> on behalf of Paul Campbell <Paul.Campbell at zap.energy>
Sent: Tuesday, November 5, 2024 1:37 PM
To: flash-users at flash.rochester.edu <flash-users at flash.rochester.edu>
Subject: [FLASH-USERS] Negative Internal Energies in the 2D, AMR, Z-Pinch problem


Hello,



I am attempting to get the 2D Z-pinch problem working with AMR but have been unable to get the sim to run without crashing .  From the logs, I appear to be running into many negative internal energy warnings.  It looks like both the electron and ion temperatures/energies need to be continuously corrected.  To try and address this issue, I have tried refining on density, electron, and ion temperatures but the warnings persist.  In terms of the AMR settings, I am using a 32x32 grid with 4x4 cells, a lrefine_max=4, and I have left the refinement cutoffs and filters unchanged from default.  My questions are:



  1.  Is this an issue with the AMR settings, would a finer grid fix this problem?
  2.  Should I be refining on different parameters?
  3.  Is this an issue with a non-AMR setting?



Paul Campbell



-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://flash.rochester.edu/pipermail/flash-users/attachments/20241105/b7e88b9e/attachment.htm>


More information about the flash-users mailing list